Circular vs Square Filters: Which One Is The Best?

When it comes to professional photography, filters play a key role in controlling light, reducing glare, and enhancing the final image. But the question remains, should you invest in circular vs square filters? Both have their pros and cons, but deciding which is best for your style depends on various factors. After experimenting with both types over the years, I have come to realise that each shines in specific situations. Let’s break it down to help you make an informed decision.

Filters come in two primary types: circular and square. Circular filters screw directly onto the front of your camera lens. They are convenient, portable, and easy to use. Many photographers, myself included, start with them. Square filters, on the other hand, are part of a holder system. This system lets you slide filters in and out, offering more flexibility. However, they can be bulkier and less intuitive for quick, on-the-go shooting.

Regardless of their shape, filters are crucial for professional photography. They help control the amount of light entering the lens, reduce reflections, and can even enhance colours. Whether you are a landscape photographer dealing with harsh lighting or a portrait photographer needing subtle enhancements, the right filter can make all the difference.

Circular filters are often marketed as the go-to option for photographers due to their simplicity and convenience. And to some extent, that’s true. Over time, I’ve appreciated the fact that they are lightweight and quick to attach, especially when I’m out in the field.

However, circular filters have their limitations, especially in more demanding situations like landscape photography, where precision is essential. One thing that always frustrated me is their limited versatility, you are locked into one size per lens thread.

Square filters may seem like overkill at first, trust me, I was hesitant to switch. But after using them for landscape shots, I quickly realised that they offer a level of flexibility that circular filters just can’t match.

But here is where I struggled: the added bulk of square filters. It’s not just the filters themselves. The holder system takes up a lot of space in your camera bag. Setting them up also takes more time. This makes them less ideal for fast paced shoots or travel photography.

For landscape photography, balancing exposure between the sky and land is crucial. Square filters are better for this. I have found square graduated ND filters provide more precision. You can slide the filter up or down to adjust light levels where needed. This is nearly impossible with circular filters.

On the other hand, when I am hiking or moving quickly, circular filters are more convenient. Setting up a square filter system can be a hassle. In those moments, a circular polarizer works well to reduce reflections and enhance colors.

For wide angle photography, square filters usually outperform circular ones. With wide lenses, stacking circular filters often causes vignetting. Square filters prevent this since the holder system is designed to avoid dark edges.

That said, for less demanding wide angle shots where filter stacking isn’t needed, circular filters still hold their ground and are easier to use.

So, which is better for professional photography? There is no clear answer. It depends on your style and needs. For portraits or casual shoots, circular filters are the easiest and most efficient. For landscape work or wide angle lenses, square filters offer more control and flexibility for professional results.

Personally, I now keep both types in my gear bag, choosing based on the demands of the shoot. When convenience matters, I reach for circular filters. But when precision and versatility are key, I go for my square filters every time.

After years of using both circular and square filters, my advice is to choose based on the type of photography you do most often. If you want something simple and lightweight, circular filters will serve you well. But if you are a landscape photographer or work with wide angle lenses, the precision and flexibility of square filters are hard to beat.

At the end of the day, neither is definitively “better”, it all depends on your style and the demands of your shoots. Personally, I have found value in having both types at my disposal, and you might, too.

When choosing between circular and square filters, it is essential to consider the type of photography you specialise in. Both options offer unique benefits depending on your needs. For quick, on the go shots, circular filters provide simplicity and speed. However, for more precise control, especially in landscape photography, square filters tend to offer better flexibility and results. If you are new to filters and want to understand how to get started, check out our Beginner’s Guide to Using Photography Circular Filters for a deeper dive into how circular filters work and when they’re most effective.

For those looking to invest in high quality filters, it is important to choose trusted brands that offer durability and precision. One such option is Schneider-Kreuznach’s B+W Filters, known for their exceptional performance and reliability. Whether you are searching for polarisers, UV filters, or neutral density filters, B+W provides a range of filter types designed to enhance your photography results. Explore their selection to find the right fit for your camera setup.